Argumentative Essay: The Challenge of Euroscepticism Organization Key and Justification Sample - by Homeworkvan

안녕하세요 :)

이번 포스팅에서는 앞서 업데이트해드렸던 Argumentative Essay 에 관련된 Instruction, Justification, 그리고 Organization Key 를 업데이트 해드릴거에요! :)

논증 논쟁적 에세이를 어떤 Instruction 토대로 작성되었는지, 그리고 작성된 에세이가 어떠한 이유로 잘 작성되어있는지를 설명도와드릴거에요 :)

Argumentative Essay Organization Key 도 같이 올려드리니, 참고하시면 좋을것같아요!

그럼 학업에 많은 도움 되길 바랄게요!

감사합니다.

Argumentative Essay: The Challenge of Euroscepticism Organization Key and Justification Sample: 논증 농쟁적 에세이 샘플 해독키

Instructions

The argumentative essay is a mainstay in college writing that represents the writer’s ability to conduct convincing and non-biased research that forwards arguments and defense on the writer’s position on the subject matter.  Write an argumentative essay from a third person point of view on any of the possible essay topics below

           1. There is a rise in Euroscepticism.
           2. Teens should take parenting classes.
           3. Smokers should pay more in taxes. 

The requirements include:

           1. Follow the essay format and have an introduction, body, and conclusion section.
           2. 3- 5 pages.
           3. APA format.
           4. Contain a reference page with at least 5 authoritative sources.



Justification


This is a good essay for the following reasons. 

·       The essay meets all the requirements with regards to page length, format, and page count.

·       The introduction starts with a hook that then followed by background information that set the context for the essay. 

·       The introduction is strengthened by the inclusion of a Toulmin style thesis statement that describes the claim and warrants/evidences for the claim advanced.

·       The essay is logically structured with an introduction, body and conclusion. Concluding sentences and topic sentences serve to make transitions between body paragraphs.

·       While the topic sentences introduce the body paragraphs, they also relate back to the warrants/evidences in the topic sentence.

·       The body paragraphs all have evidences within each paragraph that back up topic statement and its importance.

·       The conclusion starts by reintroducing the thesis statement then generalizes the evidence contained in the body paragraphs. The conclusion ends by emphasizing the main theme and provides a take-away to the audience.  

Argumentative Essay Organization Key:

Hook

Background

Thesis Statement

Topic Sentence

Discussion/Analysis

Concluding Sentence

Summary

The Challenge of Euroscepticism: The Growing Resentment over European Integration

The vote by the United Kingdom to exist the European Union (EU) was an existential shock to British and EU relations and a wake-up call to the growing skepticism towards the European Union.  The EU represents a heterogeneity of diverse interests whose national interests are constantly compromised to comply with the bloc’s unified international agenda (Jones, Menon, & Weatherill, 2012). This integration has been positive in that it has imparted political and economic strength towards member countries that would not have been possible prior to their integration. Dubbed Eurosceptics, the term has been in use for decades to describe the group of persons who question the benefits of European integration (Kattago, 2017). Not all countries have been positive in implementing the supranational policies of the EU and resulted in political divergence in those in support and in opposition to the EU project. However, Eurosceptics pose as an important stumbling block towards the ability of the EU to compete in an increasingly globally-competitive world. Despite efforts to deepen the connection between EU member states, Euroscepticism has been on a rise as a result of the 2008 financial crisis, the migrant challenge in Europe, the bureaucracy and transparency within the EU, and a rise in popularity in Eurosceptic parties.

The damaging impact of the 2008 financial crisis and the resulting remedial measures has fueled the Euroscepticism not only among debt-ridden Euro nations, but among all other constituent countries. Part of the formation of the EU was informed by the need to form an alliance that could had a stronger bargaining power in global markets comparable to other powers such as the US and later China (Jones et al., 2012). This economic union saw the respective governments tie their economic policies, laws and regulations and established a common currency to be used among member states.  This development, in turn, tied the economic fates of the different member states into one. While most countries have a certain level of debt, the 2008 financial crisis exacerbated these debt levels leading to a debt crisis in many nations. In particular, countries such as Spain and Greece whose economies are dependent on tourism were affected more as consumers worldwide cut down on travel due to lower disposable incomes (Pavolini, León, Guillén, & Ascoli, 2015). Affected Euro countries received billions of emergency funding and later established austerity measures to control the high levels of debt experienced. The unpopular austerity measures are directly related to the rise of the far-left Syriza party in Greece which has been vocally against the EU (Stavrakakis & Katsambekis, 2014). Additionally, the failure of Greece to meet repayment terms and constant debt restructuring deals have thrown doubt in the continued existence of the European Union project as lesser impacted countries are forced, by virtue of being in an economic union, to financially support debt-ridden member countries. Overall, among the most significant impacts of the 2008 financial crisis was to erode the special relationship enjoyed among European nations.  

More recently, the European migrant crisis and the social burden experienced among the populace has fueled doubt on whether the supranational decision-making systems serve to meet the best interests of member states. Due to its proximity to the conflict-ridden Africa and Middle East regions, the European Union has been an attractive destination for millions of displaced persons seeking stability, safety, and prosperity. This journey has primarily been carried out by foot and by boat with the border nations of Spain, Greece, and Malta facing the brunt of the sea-bound traffic while Bulgaria and Hungary have faced the majority of the foot-traffic. In the EU, the member nations had codified the Dublin regulation - a unified asylum policy that stipulated that the country of entry would be responsible for a refugee (Jones et al., 2012). This fact meant that border EU countries experienced disproportionate responsibility.  The absence of quotas in the initial period of the crisis meant that these border nations were left to bore the greater responsibility of taking care of immigrants over other interior EU nations.  The record flow of immigrants into these destination countries and the social burden in providing food and safety to these groups have given rise to anti-immigrant tension (Kattago, 2017). This development has reduced the popularity of continued integration among affected EU countries as they see disintegration as a means to institute stricter immigration policies that reduce the economic and social burden faced.

Related, European solidarity has been put to the rest following increased terrorist attacks on European social that has created a climate of resentment and feat. In November 2015, France was the victim of a terror attack in the Paris metropolis that left 130 dead and 430 injured following multiple bombings and shootings over the course of one night (Kepel, 2017). The attack was blamed on ISIS militants whom had placed terror cells in the country. This attack and others within Europe such as those in Germany and the UK demonstrate a significant terror threat within the EU region. However, by virtue of global politics, some EU countries such as France and the UK are more at risk as compared to states such as those in Western Europe. Moreover, terror laws and intelligence systems are not standardized between the different countries leading to challenges in response coordination.  According to Markortoff (2016), the wake of the Paris attacks led to the establishment of the European Counter Terrorism Centre but more than a year later, over 90% of the information submitted for counter-terrorism purposes has come from only five EU member states. Such statistics reinforce the idea of lack of cross-border cooperation in the political and economic union. More importantly, terror attacks and unquailed cross-border movement has provided fodder for Eurosceptic parties in Europe to shift public sentiment against the EU.

Beyond issues with migrants, debt, and terrorism, Euroscepticism is part of a long-standing interest over the legitimacy of the EU and the bureaucracy of the system. Among skeptics, the image of the EU has been a bureaucracy that establishes policies with little democracy and transparency leading to apathy and discontent. According to Ford and Goodwin (2017), the transfer of decision-making powers away from the national level to the European level has raised concerns on a deficit of democracy as national representative institutions face a reduced role in decision making. In that, the perception is national parliaments are unable to enact legislation not approved by the European Commission. However, this perception of a reduced role in decision-making does not match reality as EU citizens have indirect representation through the Council of the European Union and direct representation through the European Parliament (Jones et al., 2012). Moreover, concerns have been fielded by skeptics on the transparency of the EU. Research has shown that the complexity of the EU legislative process raises legitimate concerns on transparency with the legislation impacting on the entire populace (Baratta, 2014). Additionally, research by Brandsma (2018) on proceedings of the European Parliament committees evidence a shroud of secrecy as the main EU institutions engaged in closed-door negotiations in policy making processes. This process undermines the claims of transparency in the EU legislative process. Related, the administrative functions of the EU contribute to a large bureaucracy and associated high administrative expense. This expense budget has been a bone of contention among skeptics fueling the negative sentiment on the bureaucracy of the EU system.

Finally, the rise of nationalism and populism in Europe has increased anxiety on continued European integration and parties ride on a platform of disintegration. In June 2016, the UK run a special referendum to determine the countries continued stay in the EU. The pro-exit group was led by vocal EU detractors who perceived the UK’s relationship with the EU as limiting the country’s national sovereignty (Ford & Goodwin, 2017). The fallout by these skeptic parties was that the UK chose to leave the EU. However, these parties are not exclusive to the UK. In fact, the 2014 capture of European Parliament seats by vocal Eurosceptic parties such as the UKIP in the UK, Danish People’s Party in Denmark, the Syriza Party in Greece, and the National Front in France demonstrated the increasing clout of Euroscepticism in the EU. According to the Stokes (2015), there has been a marked decrease in public faith in not only European institutions but also the European project. While these parties do not have universal appeal, they are still a vocal minority with the capacity to mainstream disenchantment and resentment in the EU. These parties commonly tap into issues such as migrants, globalization, political elitisms, unemployment, and austerity – matters with popular appeal among the general public – to idealize a false statement on a failing EU. Kattago (2019) terms this populism as divisive and capable of disturbing the fragile peace in Europe. If Brexit is anything to go by, then Eurosceptic parties present as a real challenge to EU integration.  

The continued existence of the EU is threatened by the fallout from the 2008 global financial crisis, the influx of migrants into Europe, concerns over democracy and transparency in the EU bureaucracy, and the rise in nationalist and populist parties in Europe. The financial crisis brought demonstrated the deep economic ties between member nations and how a crisis in one nation could extend to the others, and the inability to independently control economic policies in the union. Additionally, the migrant crisis has disproportionally burdened the exterior EU member nations and increased the popularity of disintegration in order to institute independent immigration policies. This need has also been fueled by an increase in terror attacks that take advantage of the free movement of persons in Europe and the lack of proper cooperation in national security among member states. Moreover, the reduced role in decision making among national legislators and the lack of transparency in the EU policy making process has increased resentment in the political union. Eurosceptic parties have leveraged these real concerns to grow their influence and fuel further division over integration. The seeds of doubt will only grow if the EU administrative arms fail to institute reforms and demonstrate to the general European public the benefits of the complex relationship that is the EU.

========================================================= 

The following is PLAGIARISM REPORT for 'Argumentative Essay: The Challenge of Euroscepticism Organization Key and Justification Sample - by Homeworkvan'.

COPYRIGHT © 2019. All Rights Reserved by homeworkvan.

Narrative Essay: Violence is a Temporary Solution Organization Key and Justification Sample - by Homeworkvan

안녕하세요 :)

이번 포스팅에서는 앞서 업데이트해드렸던 Narrative Essay 에 관련된 가이드라인, Justification, 그리고 Organization Key 를 업데이트해드릴거에요 :)

내러티브 에세이를 어떤 가이드라인 토대로 작성되었는지, 그리고 작성된 에세이가 어떠한 이유로 잘 작성되어있는지를 설명도와드릴거에요 :)

Narrative Essay Organization Key 도 같이 올려드리니, 참고하시면 좋을것같아요!

감사합니다.

Narrative Essay: Violence is a Temporary Solution Organization Key and Justification Sample: 내러티브 에세이 샘플 해독키

Instructions

The narrative essay gives you an opportunity to share a personal experience with your audience. However, it should also be bounded within a particular purpose or reason for sharing the experience. Incorporating the essential elements of a story [characters, plot, setting, conflict, and resolution], write a 4-page narrative essay directed to your classroom audience:

·       4 full pages

·       MLA formatting

·       First person language

·       Use figurative language and device i.e. Irony, flashbacks, etc.

·       Use descriptive language and active verbs

·       Incorporate purposeful dialogue

Justification

The narrative is a good model for a narrative essay for several reasons.

A.    Story Elements

·       Characters – Besides the author, the narrative introduces several characters and use descriptive language to characterize them

·       Plot – The story follows the plot sequence with an exposition in the second paragraph that introduces the elementary school. Then a rising action that escalates the playground activities into the third element – conflict. The conflict introduces is “man v. man” that pits the author against the bully. After the conflict is the falling action when the author explains the period in high school and finally a resolution where the author learns a lesson.

·       Setting – The narrative introduces the story as being primarily set in an elementary school playground. 

B.    Development

The narrative makes good use of paragraph development with transition phrases and sentences preceding most paragraphs. Additionally, the use of dialogue reinforces the essay as a narrative. Also, the essay uses stylistic devices such as situational irony where reporting bullying also made the author suspect. Finally, the essay is purposeful with a thesis statement in the introduction making it known that the message being communicated is the author’s lesson on bullying. This purpose is reinforced in the conclusion.

Narrative Essay Organization Key: 

Thesis Statement

Dialogue

Exposition

Rising Action

Conflict

Falling Action 

Resolution

Violence is a Temporary Solution

My elementary school experiences hold memories that make me who I am today. I was bullied from the playground right through to the toilets during recess. I believe this was due to my small frame, in both height and garth. Naturally, the bigger students viewed me as a mark to inflate their ego. In retrospect, I tend to think they did this because of problems at home or perhaps they were victims of bullying. I was easy prey on which they could vent their frustrations. However, through my childhood experiences and memories, I know violence is a temporary solution to any problem.

In elementary school, I had firsthand experience of hours locked in a locker. I also remember my head in a toilet bowl or sink; punched and shoved around, a lot. I had nicknames such as “skinny bah lanky,” they played pranks on me, among other abuse. One day all this ended. I reached the end of my tether; I could not roll with the punches any more. I cracked, the psychological and physical torment had reached boiling point, and my self-esteem needed redemption.

I recall one particular incident on the playground it is as vivid as if it was yesterday. Our playground was colorful it had plenty of slides in bright green while the swings were in bright yellows, blues, and reds. There was a basketball court, a tennis court, and ample room to run around. On this particular day, I was at the basketball court enjoying my new ball. I cherished this ball because two days back my father gave it to me as a birthday present, a gift. Therefore, I was shooting hoops and lost in the activity, reveling in the joy of the moment. As expected, the bullies are always lurking around waiting for easy prey.

Nonetheless, on this particular occasion, I had not considered this reality as I dribbled the ball until a certain boy materialized at my side and began bothering me. Eventually, he snatched the ball out of my hand, without uttering a word. I felt anger rise that I never knew myself capable. My heart racing, hair damp on my forehead, teeth clamped together, and fingers clenched into fists, and I was livid. I had difficulty breathing due to the tightness in my chest, and my eyes stung with frustration. I was as a bear deprived of her cubs; nothing prepared me for what followed.

“Give that back,” I hissed under my breath.

He paid no attention nor did he acknowledge my presence. His attitude was his folly I had an emotional attachment to the ball, and I was not going to give in easily. It happened in a flash, one moment I was standing, the next, the bully was on flat on his back, and I was bent over him raining blows on his face. As if in a stupor, I stood up and the boy got on his feet and ran away howling at the top of his lungs. I felt spent, but I had a sense of achievement as I picked my “precious” ball and went to class.

            As expected, the boy went to the principal to report the incident because I was summoned to the office within ten minutes into the reading lesson. As I walked into the principal’s office, I felt neither fear nor remorse. In normal circumstances, I visited this office for good reasons; I performed exceptionally well in piano contests and mathematics. Naturally, the principal liked me but on this occasion, his brow creased and his lip curled upward in disappointment.

            “Can you explain what happened?”

            “Sir, that boy is a bully, this is not the first time he has attacked me.”

            “And, you chose to settle the matter by hitting, him? Why didn’t you come to me?”

The principal’s demeanor was one of anger, I knew arguing, or displaying my idea of ethics was a waste of my time as well as his. Instead, I scrutinized his nose as it flared and relaxed as an expression of restrained emotion. At some point I stopped listening, I came back to my senses when he said,

            “Your mother is on her way here. I must add that we do not tolerate violence.”

 I had to sit in the principal’s office until my mother arrived. Her first reaction was shock mingled with concern. Admittedly, I was a quiet child, minding my own business most of the time playing alone and reading, so the situation at hand was foreign. For the first time, I felt I had let my mother down. However, I knew in the depths of my soul that I had found a solution to the years of bullying, fight back. My mother apologized profusely concerning my violent outburst. I did not explain to my mother what transpired; I had never complained about the bullying. After this considering the same, I chose to stay silent on the matter. I was grounded which was two weeks of no TV. Thankfully, the school did not expel me, as it was the first and only stain on my sparkling record. Most importantly, I had no further incidences of bullying I enjoyed my solitude immensely.

            Little did I know that I had awakened the seed of violence, as it was dormant. In middle school, I met Pete, he was similar to me, quiet, and loved books, and we became friends. He had recently transferred to our school, and our relationship blossomed and deepened within a short time. During one lunch break, I found Andrew holding Pete by the scuff and shaking him ruthlessly. I threw down my knapsack I felt the same way as when the bully in elementary school tried to take my ball. Heart racing as I strode to the place, Pete was struggling under Andrew’s steady grip. I dug my nails into Andrew’s arm until I drew blood, I also kicked him in the shin. Andrew was a bully, big for his age but I did not think about this at the time. Yelping in pain, Andrew let go of Pete while hurling insults, I had put him in his place.

            “You losers, you geeks wait until I get you.”

I know this was empty threats, so I did not bother answering him. I knew as in elementary school I had also staked a claim,

“Do not mess with me.”

I had learned in elementary school that violence was the solution to bullying. Now in middle school I believed that the solution remained the same, I got the results I desired, eliminating the bullies. Andrew did not take the matter to the principal’s office, and I do not know why he chose to keep silent. Therefore, middle school was reasonably calm and quiet.

            By the time I was in high school; I had grown in height and girth and was no longer the skinny lanky kid. I spent hours in the gym, and I was on the football team, strong and capable of defending myself using physical strength. However, one thing bothered me when I got angry it is as if I stopped existing and I took on another personality. I wondered within myself,

            “What if one day I lose absolute control and it leads to the harm or death of a person.”

 I knew that I had to learn to control my anger in adverse situations. Then, I discovered meditation it was an Einstein moment, and I use Yoga to meditate to date.

            Generally, violence appeared as an answer to bullying, but in truth, I was never comfortable with the same. In effect, the triumph was short-lived, but I felt uncomfortable with the means of victory. Additionally, I ponder on the issue that the line between self-dense and violence is thin indeed. Therefore, to date, I resolve issues using every peaceable measure available to stir clear of violence.

========================================================= 

The following is PLAGIARISM REPORT for 'Narrative Essay: Violence is a Temporary Solution Organization Key and Justification Sample - by Homeworkvan'.

COPYRIGHT © 2019. All Rights Reserved by homeworkvan.